TPACK Modules: College & Career Readiness Educator Professional Development
The modules that I am creating for the CCR (AKA GED) adult educator are a forward-thinking move on the part of specialists as well as me, the developer. Transitioning educators, many of whom are retired from the K-12 workplace, from a traditional face-to-face experience to that of an online medium is both exciting and daunting. It is my understanding that the digital skills of the CCR adult educators varying in skill level, interest and comfort.
I have given considerable thought to my role in these learning modules. My strengths lie in pedagogical and social roles as opposed to that of managerial and technical. As indicated by my Gallop Strengths Finder survey results, my role as an online instructor is best utilized through the pedagogical and social dimensions. I neither enjoy nor gravitate to technical components of course instruction. My strength and passion is in developing educators as opposed to managing them.
A system’s based approach to learning and change is, I believe, the optimal setting for planning online learning events for adults. In hospital settings, medical teams place the patient in the center of a discussion. Welcoming all who interact with the patient, the doctor, pharmacist, therapists, social workers and family sit at the table and share in the medical decision planning.
If the above model works in a medical setting, why not use it in an online instructional setting? Educators with strengths in each of Berge’s four dimensions sit at the table. After years of working in isolation as a public educator, I think that it’s vitally important for each individual to share in the creation, dissemination, and management of learning. Understanding how each component supports the adult learner helps to provide a positive learning experience. When placing the adult learning in the center of the learning, those who sit at the table support the learning.
We are told repeatedly in adult learning that feedback is a gift. Unfortunately, it’s often challenging to give as well as to receive if individuals lack skill in doing so. One of the modules in this set of learning events engages CCR adult educators in exploring and developing feedback to engage learning. It’s an area of challenge for me. Doing so in a digital setting omits the personal component of learning that is crucial to the development of a learner.
Conversely, becoming the professional inspirer in a digital setting would engage me as the instructor in creative, real-time thinking applicable to the work of the CCR educator. The concept of a “Community of Practice” is a familiar phrase. What is often unfamiliar is how to create and participate in one. The learners in these modules may welcome a hybrid of synchronous and asynchronous learning experiences as opposed to an entirely asynchronous module. It is my hope that these modules will inspire those who engage in creating communities of practice behaviors through the learning events.
My role as the Interaction-Facilitator will be crucial to the success of this series of modules. The democratic environment described in the case study read for this week’s learning described an instructor who felt comfortable in an online discussion forum. The Google+ environment is an area where I have comfort in scaffolding discussions from previous coursework. It’s a medium that is free and easily accessible. It is also closed to those outside of the learning community, which may help individuals who are hesitant to participate feel more comfortable in doing so. Modeling social presence is a skill developed through numerous experiences, both in graduate and MOOC learning environments.
The organization for which these learning modules are created is composed of specialists who possess skill and expertise in the managerial and technical areas. I am well versed in organization and planning of learning events for children and am developing my skills in as an adult educator. The feedback that my peers in this course provide by asking questions are the eyes that are necessary for me to move outside of my head. The ability to scaffold learning for adults in previous coursework considers the principles of andragogy as opposed to that of instruction for children.
Understanding how a student perceives a course is often quite enlightening! Quite frankly, surveying learners at the conclusion of a course seem counterproductive to me. By asking the questions in the dimension of instructor roles: Pedagogical, Social, Managerial, and Technical at a time other than just the conclusion of the course would allow me to provide greater service to the learner. Understanding the degree of social presence needed in order to facilitate a successful learning is important to me as an instructor. The summary of the descriptions and issues of online instructor roles is useful when considering how I fit in this new methodology and where I need support. Understanding how a student in this module might perceive my role as an instructor, as presented by in the case study, is an essential tool for instructional planning.
Feedback allows for a better learning experience for future engagement with a module. Which strategies or methodology when communicating with learners?
Resource:
Liu, X., Bonk, C. J., Magjuka, R. J., Lee, S. H., & Su, B. (2005). Exploring four dimensions of online instructor roles: A program level case study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(4), 29-48.